Coronapocalypse; Big Pharma’s Doomsday Vaccine #666

Source: Unz Review

“And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat upon him was Death and Hell followed with him.” Revelation 6:8

Here’s your Vaccine puzzler for the day:

What do Dr. Barton WilliamsHank Aaron, and 46 elderly residents in a Spanish nursing home all have in common?

Answer— They all died shortly after getting the Covid-19 vaccine.

But let’s not jump to conclusions, after all, in every case, the media has assured us that the vaccine had nothing to do with their deaths. Do you believe that?

Of course, not, but that will probably not undermine your trust in vaccines because–as you know– not trusting vaccines is tantamount to putting on a tinfoil hat and blabbering conspiracy theories about pedophile rings in the basement of pizza parlors. It’s absolute lunacy. One must never question the unshakable integrity of the big pharmaceutical companies who only produce these miracle drugs for purely philanthropic reasons. It’s inconceivable that these experimental concoctions –which have never been tested on animals or undergone long-term trials– might have been created for political purposes rather than medicinal. Is that even remotely possible?

Yes, it is possible, but it’s also another crackpot conspiracy theory, so shut up and take the jab, right?

Wrong, because everything about the Covid vaccine is wrong, just like everything about Covid-mania is wrong. It’s all unprecedented, suspicious and, frankly, weird. None of it passes the smell test, none of it. When have we ever locked down the entire country to slow the spread of a virus? When have we ever quarantined 300 million healthy people, ordered everyone to wear masks, shut down businesses, bars and schools, and pushed the economy off a cliff?



When have public health experts and their Democrat allies usurped emergency powers and ruled by executive fiat essentially short-circuiting the constitutional powers of the state legislatures?

When have the media and the Tech Giants removed scientists, epidemiologists, virologists and statisticians from their platforms because their professional views conflicted with the nonsensical “official narrative” of white-coat phonies like Tony Fauci?

When have state agencies actively taken part in the purging of the accounts of individuals whose opinions do not support the mass vaccination of millions of people with a toxic cocktail that may-or-may-not impact long-term health, fertility and, yes, life itself?

When has a giant media organization, like AP, launched a full-page attack on “conspiracy theorists” whose views on the shadowy origins of the Covid infection do not match their own? (“The superspreaders behind top COVID-19 conspiracy theories“, The Seattle Times) And why does it matter to them? Is the MSM so insecure that they feel they must viciously belittle those people with whom they disagree rather that provide objective in-depth reporting? And how does this spiteful behavior affect the public? Do people want to see their media act as enforcers of state doctrine by targeting and crushing anyone who doesn’t parrot the party doctrine? Do they like it when journalists become attack dogs for the political establishment and big pharma? Is that why we have a First Amendment?

But–media aside– the experience of the last year has been completely weird, hasn’t it? And, yet, if one simply speculates on what they think might be driving the weirdness, they are immediately smeared, censored and dragged through the mud by an army of trolls. So much for free speech, eh?

Is that normal or is someone very afraid that they are losing their control over the “spinning” of information? This is the reaction that one would expect from someone who is accustomed to monopolizing information and is determined not to share that power with anyone else. It’s also the behavior of someone who is not being completely straightforward about their objectives, someone who has something to hide.

So, what are they hiding? Who is pulling the media’s strings? Who gives Fauci and the Democrat Governors their marching orders? Who’s calling the shots in this pandemic fiasco or aren’t you the slightest bit curious?

Imagine for a minute that everything we are currently experiencing is not the random response of a government that is trying to muddle through a thorny and stressful crisis, but part of a broader plan to generate as much hysteria as possible in order to create a submissive public that clicks its heels and follows orders without question? Is that too far-fetched?

And let’s say, that at the very peak of the hysteria, a bolt of lightning appears in the night sky and suddenly there is a miracle drug, a vaccine, that promises to deliver the people from their collective misery and return them safely to normal life. Doesn’t that strike you as a bit coincidental? Oh yeah, and let’s not forget that this life-saving vaccine was invented just days after the presidential election. (Nothing to see here, move along.) It almost seems like it was part of a script, but that couldn’t be true, because that would mean that our leaders are scheming dishonest miscreants who can’t be trusted. Perish the thought.

But ask yourself this: Who is touting this new wonder drug and insisting that all 7 billion people on the planet get inoculated? Is it the scientists, virologists and epidemiologists who have no dog in the fight and who’s judgements are based on the science alone, or is it the conflicted state bureaucrats, the public health toadies and do-goodie billionaires who seek access to the personal biology of all humanity in order to effect the changes they believe will trim the world’s population and reverse the projected acceleration of climate change? Which is it?

And why– you may ask– have these do-goodie-billionaire climate activists settled on public health when their real passion is depopulation and global warming?

Good question.

Isn’t it because they have identified vaccines as the access-point they need to achieve their ambitions? Isn’t that why they have spent decades creating the critical infrastructure for the global public health organizations, not to improve the lives and health of impoverish mothers and children in Africa and India, but to expand and reinforce the tentacles of this new international vaccine-deployment hydra that can reach across the earth and draw every human being into its oily grip.

This isn’t a conspiracy theory. This infrastructure actually exists and it has been greatly expanded and strengthened in the last decade. But, why?

I would argue that this infrastructure was not painstakingly assembled to save humanity from the “killer virus”, but to implement a strategy for inserting needles in the arms of 7 billion people. This is not philanthropy. This is something else altogether. Something calculating, underhanded, and sinister. But that is just my opinion.

Of course, it’s all a crazy conspiracy theory and even if it is happening it’s not really happening because our real owners and our new Reality Czar have already decided that it’s not happening. In fact, they are reaching out across the Internet to “disappear” anyone who dares to mention what they think is actually going on. That said, we still must reconcile all the inconsistencies, half-truths and outright lies with the fact that people are dying after taking the jab. That’s the one fact that cannot be denied.

So, how do we resolve these inconsistencies? How do we explain the permanent state of emergency that only serves to strengthen the power of tyrants and their lackeys, how do we reconcile the lockdowns, the masks, the school closures, and the deliberate obliteration of our civilization for a virus that kills just 1 in every 400 infected people?

It’s impossible. It can’t be done. When the government goes crazy and loses the confidence of the people, skeptics will come up with theories that explain what’s going on. It’s only natural. And that’s what’s happening now.

As for the vaccines, well, we know that reputable professionals have warned us that these zombie injections could impact fertility health and mortality, but is that probable? After all, the experts, celebrities and media are promoting these mRNA vaccines with more exuberance than any Madison Avenue product-launch in history. Maybe we should set aside our concerns and just go with the flow. After all, what could go wrong?. Check out this except from an interview with Dr. Chris Shaw, Ph.D, Specialist in Neuroplasticity and Neuropathology. Here’s what he said:

The mRNA lipid-coated PEG-construct– by Moderna’s own study–does not stay localized but spreads throughout the body including the brain. Found in animal studies in bone marrow, brain, lymph nodes, heart, kidneys liver, lungs etc Doctors are saying that the vaccine does NOT cross the blood-brain barrier, but that is NOT true. …If it reaches the brain there will be an auto immune response that will cause inflammation What characterizes virtually all neuro-degenerative diseases is this misfolded protein that is characteristic to Lou Gerrigs disease, to Alzheimer’s, to Parkinsons to Huntington’s etc. They are different proteins, but they tend to form these sheets of misfolded proteins called Beta Sheets. Now you are asking cells in various parts of the body–including the brain– to make alot of these proteins and release them to the outside, and , are we sure that’s what’ it’s all doing? Are you getting clusters of misfolded proteins inside neurons? That would be a bad thing to do.. So you’d like to know where it is, how much of it there is, and which groups of neuronal groups its targeted. .and those are the kinds of questions you like the companies to have solved long before they got authorization and discovered some years later that they have a problem.”

This is a vast experiment that should have been done in the lab on animals and now it is being done on people ..The potential is that you are going to harm alot of people while you do this experiment.” (“NEUROSCIENTIST’S CONCERNS ABOUT COVID VACCINES”, Chris Shaw, Ph.D, Specialist in Neuroplasticity and Neuropathology)

Sound serious?

It does to me. Frankly, I’d rather not have synthetic toxins from an experimental vaccine floating around in my brain, but that’s just me.

Now check out this clip from an interview with Robert F Kennedy Jr for a bit of background on these mRNA vaccines:

“What we know about coronavirus from 30 years of experience is that a coronavirus vaccine has a unique peculiarity, which is any attempted making of the vaccine has resulted in the creation of a class of antibodies that actually make vaccinated people sicker when they ultimately suffer exposure to the wild virus. Following the SARS epidemic that began in 2002, China launched a concerted effort to develop a coronavirus vaccine. They succeeded in developing 30 promising models, and they chose the four “best in class” to fabricate and then test on ferrets, the animal most analogous to human beings when it comes to upper respiratory infections.

The ferrets all developed admirable, robust, and durable antibody responses, and the scientists believed they had hit the jackpot. But then, when the animals suffered exposure to the wild virus, something frightening happened. The vaccinated animals sickened and died with body-wide inflammation. The vaccine had created a condition known as paradoxical inherent immune response, which amplified the injury caused by the illness rather than preventing it.

The scientists at that time recalled a similar occurrence from the 1960s where the NIH had conducted studies on a vaccine for RSV, an upper respiratory illness very similar to coronavirus. The 35 children in that study had developed a strong antibody response but had become terribly ill upon exposure to wild RSV. Two of the children died. Remembering this incident, the scientists in 2012 abandoned their efforts to create that vaccine. And that is why today you are hearing dire warnings from unexpected quarters… who have all warned that a coronavirus vaccine may end up making people sicker from coronavirus rather than avoiding the disease.” (“Interview with Robert F Kennedy J”, Children’s Health Defense)

Repeat: “when the animals suffered exposure to the wild virus, something frightening happened. The vaccinated animals sickened and died with body-wide inflammation.”

This is recurrent theme when one reads alternate literature on the mRNA vaccine. It may also explain why the vaccine manufacturers skipped animal trials before seeking approval from the FDA. We should also note, that none of the current crop of vaccines have concluded their Phase 3 trials which will not be finished for two years from today. Readers should not find that reassuring.

Let’s take a minute and dig a little deeper into this idea that vaccines can actually make you sicker and perhaps die. Here’s a blurb from a research paper published in Nature in July 2020 on the condition called Antibody-dependent Enhancement:

“Antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of disease is a general concern for the development of vaccines and antibody therapies because the mechanisms that underlie antibody protection against any virus have a theoretical potential to amplify the infection or trigger harmful immunopathology. This possibility requires careful consideration at this critical point in the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)…

The implications of our lack of knowledge are twofold. First, comprehensive studies are urgently needed to define clinical correlates of protective immunity against SARS-CoV-2. Second, because ADE of disease cannot be reliably predicted after either vaccination or treatment with antibodies—regardless of what virus is the causative agent—it will be essential to depend on careful analysis of safety in humans as immune interventions for COVID-19 move forward….


It is clear that after many years, and considerable attention, the understanding of ADE of disease after either vaccination or administration of antiviral antibodies is insufficient to confidently predict that a given immune intervention for a viral infection will have negative outcomes in humans…

Additional mechanism-focused studies are needed to determine whether small-animal and NHP models of virus infection, including for SARS-CoV-2, can predict the probable benefits or risks of vaccines or passive-antibody interventions in humans….

In the meantime, it will be necessary to directly test safety and define correlates of protection conferred by vaccines and antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and other viral pathogens in human clinical trials.” (“A perspective on potential antibody-dependent enhancement of SARS-CoV-2“, Nature)

Let’s summarize:

  1. You could get sick and die. (Quote– “Antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) creates the “potential to amplify the infection or trigger harmful immunopathology.”)
  2. We don’t know what we don’t know. (Quote–“…ADE of disease cannot be reliably predicted after either vaccination or treatment with antibodies… it will be essential to depend on careful analysis of safety in humans as immune interventions for COVID-19 move forward….”)
  3. We are flying blind and hoping for the best. (Quote– “Additional mechanism-focused studies are needed to determine whether small-animal and NHP models of virus infection, including for SARS-CoV-2, can predict the probable benefits or risks of vaccines or passive-antibody interventions in humans….”)
  4. Let’s keep testing because we have no idea if what we are doing is safe. (Quote– “In the meantime, it will be necessary to directly test safety and define correlates of protection conferred by vaccines and antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and other viral pathogens in human clinical trials.”)

So, while Shaw sees one set of potential problems, Kennedy sees others altogether different. But these are just the tip of the iceberg because Dr. J. Patrick Whelan, a pediatric rheumatologist, believes the mRNA vaccines could cause microvascular injury to the brain, heart, liver and kidneys in ways not assessed in safety trials. In fact, he even wrote a detailed letter to the FDA in December warning them explicitly about these potential dangers. Here’s an excerpt from an article at Global Research that provides the details:

“I am concerned about the possibility that the new vaccines aimed at creating immunity against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein have the potential to cause microvascular injury to the brain, heart, liver and kidneys in a way that does not currently appear to be assessed in safety trials of these potential drugs.”

Whelan was referring to the fact that mRNA vaccines work by incorporating the genetic blueprint for the key spike protein on the virus surface into a formula that — when injected into humans — instructs our own cells to make the spike protein….

Based on the research conducted to date, it is very likely that some recipients of the spike protein mRNA vaccines will experience the same symptoms and injuries associated with the virus.

Again, according to Whelan, “the potential to cause microvascular injury (inflammation and small blood clots called microthrombi) to the brain, heart, liver and kidney … were not assessed in the safety trials.”..

Ignoring these valid and scientifically supported warnings may result in hundreds of millions of people suffering potentially deadly injuries or permanent damage following vaccination. It will also further erode the dwindling confidence that our country has in our federal regulatory agencies to protect the health of all Americans

Unfortunately, Whelan’s concerns were not acknowledged, and the agency instead relied on the limited clinical trial data. The VRBPAC endorsed the use of the Pfizer vaccine on Dec. 10. The following day, the FDA issued the first COVID-19 vaccine emergency use authorization allowing the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine to be widely distributed in individuals 16 and older without calling for the additional studies that Whelan felt were critical to assure safety of the vaccine, especially in children.” (“Could Spike Protein in Moderna, Pfizer Vaccines Cause Blood Clots, Brain Inflammation and Heart Attacks?” Global Research)

These are just a few of the many warnings that medical professionals have issued publicly. They reflect the growing concerns about this new regime of dodgy vaccines. Needless to say, their warnings have either fallen on deaf ears or been lost in the celebratory din surrounding the new wonder drug. As we speak, millions of people around the world are being injected with an experimental nanoparticle that may-or-may-not impact their health and well-being for the rest of their lives. They have based their decision not on sound science and long-term outcomes, but on relentless fearmongering followed by a garish and overpowering media blitz. This crass manipulation of public perceptions precludes what any reasonable person would call “informed consent”. We are being led like sheep to the slaughter.

So, here’s the million-dollar question: Are the Covid vaccines safe or not?

How could they be? They were not sufficiently tested, the technology is new and experimental, Phase 3 Trials have not been completed, thorough animal trials were never conducted, there is no data on long-term adverse side effects, and the final product was ramrodded through the “rubber stamp” FDA under the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) provision. On top of that, medical professionals are now warning us that the vaccines could “cause microvascular injury to the brain, heart, liver and kidneys.”

The American people need to consider these things before they make their decision.

Read the 1776 Report Joe Biden Wanted to Bury

One of the last acts of the Trump Administration was the release on Monday of the “1776 Report”—a 45-page document by the President’s Advisory 1776 Commission “summarizing the principles of the American Founding and how those principles have shaped our country.”

Sounds straightforward enough. But as a rebuke of the New York Times‘ false and misleading “1619 Project,” the commission’s work to promote patriotic education was bound to stoke controversy. Sure enough, the report was immediately blasted by the press and left-wing academics as “biased” and “racist,” among other smears.

One of Joe Biden’s first acts on Wednesday was to sign an executive order ending the commission and rescinding the report. It was immediately scrubbed from the White House website (though it remains archived at the Trump White House site, as required by law).

We believe the report should be read closely, shared widely, and discussed honestly. In the coming weeks and months, American Greatness will publish a series of articles highlighting the importance of the 1776 Commission’s unfinished work and showing why the principles of the American Founding are so vital—and so often misunderstood.

Click to download The President’s Advisory 1776 Commission – Final Report.


“There is something about the way the CIA has been functioning that is casting a shadow over our historic position and I feel that we need to correct it.”

75 Years Ago — President Truman Creates the Central Intelligence Group (January 22, 1946)

Source: Intel Today

War and Peace

Reading notes: JFK and the Unspeakable, James W. Douglass

(The Unspeakable) is the void that contradicts everything that is spoken even before the words are said; the void that gets into the language of public and official declarations at the very moment when they are pronounced, and makes them ring dead with the hollowness of the abyss. It is the void out of which Eichmann drew the punctilious exactitude of his obedience.” Thomas Merton, Raids on the Unspeakable, 1966

We are living through dangerous times. The worst part of it is that we do not know how dangerous, for our isolation (writing this in January 2020) keeps us from a reality we may only guess at, through a veil of secrecy and falsehood. This is why we read history, to retrace our steps, to check how we got where we are, to seek examples, precedents, maybe even explanations, in a perhaps naive attempt to see through the Unspeakable.

The 1960s were also a dangerous time: then the ideology of the Cold War, born from the shock of World War II and its consequences, directed the US government’s Foreign and Defence policies, its hegemonic ambitions and view of a world sharply divided between evil Communism and the Free World, or so it was claimed. President Eisenhower did warn his successor of the nefarious influence of the “Military-industrial complex”. Still Ike did not attempt, far from it, to reduce that influence, and handed over to John Kennedy an already inflated military, whose top brass dreamed of a first thermonuclear first strike to finish off the USSR, and a tentacular Central Intelligence Agency. Mr Douglass’ book is a masterpiece, its reading a harrowing experience. First published in 2008, JFK and the Unspeakable is a meticulous research of the circumstances and machinations that led to the assassination of the young president on November 22 1963, and of the cover-up that followed immediately. It is also a spiritual journey, tracing back the young president’s conversion from Cold War rhetoric to Peace, after the near tragedy of the Cuban Missiles Crisis.

Awakened by Martin Luther King’s murder, and inspired by Thomas Merton’s writing, Mr Douglass uncovers the Unspeakable through the plot that led to the murder of John Kennedy. One year in the Kennedy’s presidency, Thomas Merton had written:

I have little confidence in Kennedy, I think he cannot fully measure up to the magnitude of his task, and lacks creative imagination and the deeper kind of sensitivity that is needed. Too much of the Time and Life mentality, than which I can imagine nothing further, in reality, from, say, Lincoln. What is needed is really not shrewdness or craft, but what the politicians don’t have: depth, humanity and a certain totality of self-forgetfulness and compassion, not just for individuals but for man as a whole: a deeper kind of dedication. Maybe Kennedy will break through into that some day by miracle. But such people are before long marked out for assassination.

After saving the world from the horrors of a nuclear holocaust, with the help of Nikita Krushchev, at the time of the Cuban missiles, John Kennedy fought back the Military-Industrial complex, in the persons of his Chiefs of Staff and most of his advisers, in Laos, which was temporarily neutralised, in Vietnam where he resisted constant attempts at engaging the US Military in full strength to combat the insurgency, in Africa where he championed African nationalism, in Indonesia, in Berlin. In June 1963, his Commencement Address at American University in Washington, was a declaration of Peace, where the president made clear his intentions on disarmement, and ending the Cold War. In the summer of 1963 the Limited Test Ban Treaty, outlawing nuclear tests “in the atmosphere, beyond its limits, including outer space, or under water, including territorial waters or high seas” was signed with the Soviets, and approved by the US Senate.

Mr Douglass leaves no stone unturned: reading his book we are left, stunned, but without any doubt as to the origin of the plot, its sponsors, the cover-up that followed the assassination, and the reason for it, as Thomas Merton predicted. Today, Eisenhower’s Military-Industrial complex has morphed into what some describe as the “Deep State”, the Cold War has been coopted for the War on Terror, the threat of nuclear war is still with us, although the USSR is no more. Untouched and untouchable, the Unspeakable reigns.

The Power of Confusion

Source: The Vineyard of the Saker

By Jimmie Moglia for the Saker Blog

It now seems certain that we have a Jon Bidet for president. For if a rose by any other name would smell as sweet, a Biden, metaphorically speaking, by any other name still smells like a poorly maintained sanitary device, however many euphemisms the imagination may body forth out of the forms of things unknown.

The American election campaign with its arcane modalities, along with the contemporary pandemic narrative, and somehow functional to it, have revealed the progress of an inextricable confusion. Statistics, medicine, health, illness, science, opinion, belief, critique, criticism, freedom, law, crime, punishment, openness, censorship, liberty, compulsion, have lost their original meanings. And the amazed world by such amazing changes, no longer knows which is which.

There are ethical bombings, therapeutic missiles, democratic assassinations and humanitarian imperialism. Even the most perspicacious reasoner may be easily bewildered, while the mythical average citizen, lost in the mental labyrinth of Newspeak, feels as if he had stumbled into the utter darkness of a starless universe.

Still, looking at the whole as impartially as we can, it cannot be denied that confusion is the raw material of power.

The general conception of power describes it as a regime of asymmetric transactions involving a strong dealing with a weaker contractor. Disrespect for the laws means jail, failure to pay bills leads to extinction of service, non-payment for ‘protection’ results in the store being burned, etc. The basis of power is then a concrete threat with the consequent fear of the threatened.

If the relationship of meanings were so straightforward, the nature of power would not require further investigation. However, reality shows that he who doesn’t comply with the laws can incur penalties, but power may and can treat much worse him who tries to comply with them.

That power is based on fear is patently clear, but fear creates assuefaction and can also be rationalized. However, a rational analysis of power does not imply the acceptance that power is rational. On the contrary, nonsense and self-censorship represent a constant of its behavior and communications, leading to the conclusion that power is schizogenic and schizocratic, as a European philosopher has determined.

Examples. Ever since Reagan and Thatcher the operating economic concept has been the oxymoronic concept of expansion with austerity, meaning, in practice, gluttony at the top and hunger at the bottom. For capitalism likes deflation along with the pauperization of the unworthy crowd. But in a regime of constant stagnation who will pay the taxes?

Inter-imperialist and inter-capitalist conflicts may explain some inconsistencies we are witnessing – e.g. demonizing and threatening China while buying all that China can sell. But there is no such conflict when considering economic policies. If Trump really wanted to defend the most national capitalistic entities against transnational ones, what was the point of indiscriminately reducing taxes to all corporations, domestic and transnational?

The Supreme Court refused to examine the charges of massive fraud in the presidential elections, brought forth and demonstrated by the plaintiff. The reasoning, in layman’s terms, is that fraud was none of the Court’s business, even when it involves the actual future of the country – of whose laws, and therefore civilized existence the Supreme Court is the supreme arbiter. One reasonable conclusion is that the majority of the Supreme Court does not feel as powerful or secure as the supremacy implied in its appellation would suggest. In laymen’s terms some of the ‘supremes’ fear for their ass. The confused citizen wonders what is ‘supreme’ about the Supreme Court.

On the other hand power does not live by planning but by power, as if in a kind of blissful irresponsibility. Where power, for maximum effectiveness, includes confusion and nonsense. During my corporate days, I remember passing by rows of cubicles in a large office hall, one cubicle for each individual, veritable monuments to the unknown employee. In some of them the dweller had hanged a poster with the script, “If you cannot dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.”

And in terms of pure domination, nonsense pays off; for nonsense is more seductive than fear. US President Harry Truman is credited with the sentence summing up the principle of psycho-war, “if you cannot convince them, confuse them”. In reality power prefers to confuse rather than convince, since beliefs can change. Both fear-based domination and conviction-based consensus are uncertain and transient, while a confusional state can perpetuate itself indefinitely over time, establishing a sense of permanent loss and fragility and thus a lasting dependence. Covid-19 docet.

Another classical example. Communism in Russia died 30 years ago. And yet the US cabal sees Russia as the same threatening power of yonder years. The proverbial average citizen, more interested in the sexuality of royals and of show-people than in the actual world around him, will depend on the televisual ministry of truth for actual news, the shorter the better, leading to the average citizen’s assured and lasting dependence on lies.

Some psychopaths, though not being in a position of strength, can establish dominant relations over other people; this is achieved through a behavioral pattern where an attitude of giving an exaggerated importance to the other is alternated with an exactly opposite attitude, contempt and ridicule. By so dong the victim is persuaded that he lost the benevolence of the other because of some personal mistake. While fear can be rationalized, this confusional state, instead, leads to an uncritical identification with one’s aggressor.

The development of the Covid emergency demonstrates the principle. Power has alternated an exaggerated attention to the health and lives of citizens with callous disregard for their economic survival. Even the most sordid business connected to the emergency is presented to public opinion with a communications technique already described in literature. Power can be angry at you for harboring suspicion while, at the same time, it makes you feel that what you suspect is certain.

Hence the ordinary citizen today does not know what power wants from him. He strives to literally follow the most absurd rules, at times nonsensical, at times draconian, at times falsely permissive. Yet, the more he strives to comply, the more he is threatened with imminent new dangers (e.g. new strains of the same virus requiring more coercion and (?) new vaccines). In the end the situation dampens the desire for rebellion, while it reinforces, in the most part, the feeling of having something wrong within oneself. For a confusional state, therefore, creates more dependence than fear or consent.

Equally, a confusional state blocks the individual’s mind from perceiving the massive buffoonery of which he is the target. In this sense, and from the point of view of power, buffoons are a godsend – because they don’t understand what they are doing, believe everything which is in the domain of personal interest, know how to lie because their whole life is a dissimulation, and create enough confusion to disorient people and prevent the birth of a coordinated and widened opposition.

The instrumental use of the virus has been contradicted and exposed by many. Who are competent, illustrious people, credible on paper at least as the ensigns of the virus, and have provided mountains of evidence for an operation with horrible or at least questionable ends. Just to quote an example, during the last 30 years, the US government had to indemnify people damaged by vaccines for a total amount of 4.4 billion $. A proportionate indemnity applied for people equally damaged by vaccines in the UK. Yet, as it is widely known, Pfizer is legally exempted from compensating patients damaged by the vaccine.

As for the highly paid, highly visible and highly wrong ‘scientists’ pontificating on sundry viruses, they are living proof that no estimates are more in danger of erroneous calculations then those by which a man computes the force of his own genius.

Regarding the concurrent goals of the pandemic, the operation is not even hidden, so much so that the term ‘The Great Reset” (attributed to the Caliban-looking Karl Schwab, mastermind of the World Economic Forum) has almost become part of the common parlance. Yet, such is the mental and moral armor that confusion, conformism and fear have instilled into most, that the extraordinary conjuncture (virus-great reset) is either overlooked at large or mostly relegated to the limbo of so-called conspiracy theories.

From such a perspective, the parallels between the American elections and the Covid phenomenon are more meaningful than random. Can there actually be a straight connection? As long as the inquirer is not asked to resort to crude generalizations and vulgar simplifications such as a simple ‘yes’ or ‘no’ he may be allowed to proceed. For history (and indeed life) can be compared to a Byzantine mosaic, composed of an apparently endless number of tiles. A single independent tile could not possibly suggest or enable to imagine the whole. Yet the mosaic would lose its completeness if that tile were missing.

I will therefore collect some ‘tiles’ of the “Great Reset,” which encompasses events intrinsically connected, namely the fraudulent recent presidential elections, the pandemic as a means for crowd and mass control, the practical elimination of the middle class, the fight against Western Christian civilization, the ethnic replacement in Europe and America of the white race via mass third-world in-migration, corresponding to the final stage of the Kalergi plan.

Known to many, I will just repeat here the end goal of the plan, the substitution of the white Western ethnicity with a Negroid race via miscegenation. Images of men on the walls of ancient Egyptian tombs will give the idea of how the “new European” will look, writes Kalergi. And ruling over this new inferior race will be the Jews, the best of whom will have, in the meantime, intermarried with the best and most successful whites, to amend some racial characteristics among the chosen people, produced by millennial intertribal marriages.

The previous paragraph may sound anti-Semitic were it not an actual quote from the book “Praktischer Idealismus” published by Kalergy, the recognized founder of the European Union, whose work was massively supported by Jewish bankers both in Europe and America.

Still, all this could be thought of as a bold hypothesis, were it not confirmed by palpable evidence that only willful mental blindness could ignore or contradict.

Just one example among many, concurrent with the elections and the pandemic, the New York Times, under ownership of the chosen people since 1895, carrier of the ‘official’ political American opinion, and best known newspaper in the world, published an article by Roger Cohen titled, “Trump’s Last Stand for White America.” (Oct 16, 2020)

Yet, historically, we are approaching the end of a project whose roots sink into what for us is a bare faint remembrance of things past. Still, there is no shortness of evidence. For example, thus writes Emperor Claudius, in 41 AD, “I command the Jews not to agitate for anything beyond that which they have hitherto enjoyed, and not from henceforth, as if they lived in two cities, to send two embassies — a thing which never occurred before now – nor to intrude themselves into games and elections, but to profit by what they possess and to enjoy in a city, not their own, an abundance of all good things, and not to introduce or invite others of their race who make voyages to Alexandria from Syria or Egypt, thus compelling me to conceive the worst suspicions; otherwise I will by all means take vengeance upon them, as fomenting a general plague upon the whole world.”

Claudius made this proclamation, in response to riots between Greeks and Jews in Alexandria. He thought that peace in the city would be restored if the Jews ceased certain negative behaviors. Meaning agitating for heightened and special privileges (“to agitate for anything beyond that which they have hitherto enjoyed”); attempting to circumvent established practices of representative politics (“to send two embassies — a thing which never occurred before now”); attempting to intrude into, and disrupt, the cultural life of the Alexandrians (“to intrude themselves into games and elections”); attempting to manipulate the demographic balance of the city (“to introduce or invite Jews who make voyages to Alexandria from Syria or Egypt”); and finally, abusing and exploiting the advantage of their diaspora condition to cause problems internationally (“fomenting a general plague upon the whole world”).

Next, it may be instructive to compare the pronouncement of Emperor Claudius with the following very recent speech by the good Rabbi Yosef Mizrachi, which some have titled, “God will bury America.” It is a transcription but the original can be found here,

“The Jews run the show in the world. Not because they want to but because that’s what God wants. And it’s written in the Torah that the non-Jew admit that this is the word of God. And if they did not admit what is the proof?

But in the Torah it says that in every nation you, the Jews, will be always the highlight of the place. Even though we are only a small part of the community compared to America, 300 million Americans, 5 million Jews, no comparison. But the Jews are everywhere. All the systems of Trump, Jews. All of the system of the Sleepy Joe, Jews. Obama? Jews. Everyone around them Jews, conservative Jews, “Habat knit (?)” Jews. All somehow, same thing was in Spain, same thing was in many different countries. When a country hosts the Jews, and the Jews live in that country with freedom, God blesses this place thanks to the Jews. As soon as they torture them, or kill them, or throw them out of the country, the end of the empire shortly comes to them one by one.

The Roman empire, when it started with (messing with) the Jews that was the end. After the Jews no more Roman Empire. The Greeks? Same story. Babylonia disappeared. Persia (inaudible) in Iran modern days.

The Iranian Shah was very good to the Jews. Iran was the fourth powerful country in the world, in his time. After Russia, America, I think Germany. Iran, who was selling oil, controlling the market. Iran was an empire several years ago. The Jews ran away when Khamenei came and Iran went back in time 1000 years. The end of Iran came. Germany, they killed the Jews. It used to be a massive empire – they are now one more country, nothing special. Spain, same thing. the Jews were in power, then they did the Spanish Inquisition. Spain and Portugal? There is nothing left from them. Russia… there were many hundreds of thousands of Jews there. Russia was a powerful empire. The Jews left Russia, the USSR collapsed. the Jews in America have assimilated and have nothing to worry. But the Jews that are religious will have to get away within a year or two or five – all have to run away from here. Once we would leave this place Hashem (God) will bury America. That’s what is going to happen. Not because I am some kind of a prophet. I am not giving you any prophecy, I am just describing to you a divine formula. The chosen people when they (the locals) are going to be good and nice to them I (God) will bless you from that place.”

Many have described but relatively few have given logical explanations for the overwhelming power that Zionists hold in the countries they are hosts of. Recently I heard one that, in my view, merits consideration. It goes as follows. Like any other group or people or nation, Jews contain a criminal element. But their criminal element is exceptional and uniquely different from any other criminal entity, because of their historicity as a global travelling group. This always gives the criminal element an advantage as long as they operate in the criminal ground, and that’s why they occupy positions of power and control. As the good rabbi said, “All the systems of Trump, Jews. All of the system of the Sleepy Joe, Jews. Obama? Jews. Everyone around them Jews, conservative Jews, “Habat knit (?)” Jews. All somehow, same thing was in Spain, same thing was in many different countries.”

It’s not because of just skill, it’s because of coercion, bribery, blackmail, corruption and deceit that many of these people end up in positions of power. The host nation is not capable of resisting them once they are brought into the pen, when the wolf has been allowed among the sheep.

Joe Bidet is a ‘Catholic’ sheep who excels at applying his tongue with gusto to the buttocks of his masters. Besides, 30 pieces of silver will buy more than one Judas. In various occasions he has defined himself an ardent Zionist. There is no depth of flattery he did not resort to. As when he told one of the many Zionist organizations in the country that, “The Jews have been major contributors to the success of America.”

In this context, it may be interesting to examine an extract from one of his very recent declarations to an audience of African Americans.

Biden said he wants to appeal to Trump’s 75 million voters but not by “giving them anything.” He repeatedly drew parallels between white Trump supporters and the Ku Klux Klan, and further suggested he was planning to use the bully pulpit to harass white Trump supporters for their “racism” as though they’re KKK members.

He also said he got a call from the Pope to congratulate him on his victory and the Pope told him that “the most important thing you have to do is to deal with racism.”

As a side note, Pope Bergoglio said that migrants are ‘God’, that European must miscegenate because the Madonna was a mulatto. And as a symbolic sign of a more-than-symbolic subservience of the Catholic church to the New World Order, the most recent Nativity Scene in St. Peter’s square was made up of Startrek characters. And in the Nativity Scenes of some Italian churches Joseph and Mary wear anti-Covid masks. It may be more colorful than meaningful but many Catholics openly call Bergoglio the “Antichrist.”

Biden talked about the deluge of biracial couples in commercials as evidence of progress and an indicator of where society is heading, “Fifteen years ago could you turn on the television and see few commercials being biracial.”

“You want to know where society’s going?” Biden said. “Watch entertainment, watch the profit motive.”

“Why are these commercials, so many of them biracial? The young generation is changing, they’re demanding more, they don’t come with the baggage — maybe 10, 20, 25 percent of them are pure racists, who knows — but the vast majority, the vast majority, are not at all (as) when I was coming up.”

It was interesting to hear Biden talking so forthrightly. Unlike Trump, he’s coming with plans (read, those of his masters). Unfortunately, they are disgusting and, as he said, “This country is doomed” (meaning, unless it opens the border to the third world and whites miscegenate).

Trump did much to promote Zionist objectives, including the recognition of Jerusalem as capital of the Jewish state and of the occupied Golan Heights as Israeli territory, the assassination of eminent and respected Iranian leaders, the acquiescence in considering ISIS a ‘terrorist’ organization – whereas it is/was but a Saudi setup with strong Israeli participation. Yet it is astonishing that Zion did not find it sufficient – maybe short of a public circumcision, possibly performed by the aforementioned Rabbi Mizrachi.

Given Biden’s plans, the pandemic is a perfect tool of confusion and a tile in the mosaic of the Kalergi plan. As well as a perfect test of how much and how far elites can go in (effectively) emasculating entire populations, preventing or eliminating the risk of upheavals – in the style of the now-all-but-forgotten Gilets Jaunes. For the pandemic has brought the threat – no matter whether real or narrated – to the biological level of pure existence. A state to which attempts are made to reduce us, so as to erase the resistance and the consciousness that were beginning to emerge.

In summary, if multinational, pharmaceutical and banking cartels make up the laws, if America accepts the verdict of falsified elections (which means accepting the death of representation), if Europe and America are driven by lobbies and cartels still seeking all sorts of hegemonies, then we live in a perfect tyranny, because it is a tyranny that successfully hides itself.

Finally, the present is a fleeting moment, the past is no more and our prospect of futurity is dark and doubtful. But we think, therefore we are, and thought is still free from the extant censorship, unthinkable just a few decades ago.

We can take the view that so long as Heaven has condemned us to suffer, patience is a virtue. On the other hand, we can hope and work at creating the anger required to destroy tyranny. For, as Thomas Aquinas said, “The absence of anger is a sign of the absence of reason.”

Picture: The Babylon Bee

Of many reasons to leave

As I started these blogs, over ten years ago, I found social media a helpful adjunct, to promote posts, to meet other bloggers, to share. Freedom of expression was then key. We all accepted simple rules: fundamentally to communicate as sensible and decent human beings, irrespective of our beliefs. In a way the dereliction of the mainstream press helped: here we could express, contest, challenge, debate. Sadly this is no longer the case. Something changed, and the change can be dated to the outrageous campaign of villification that targetted opposition movements in Europe, and the presidency of Donald Trump in the USA.

Suffice to say that for any Internet platform to act intrusively, on behalf of vested interests, against the freedom of expression of its customers, is simply unacceptable to free-thinking people. This is a negation of the raison d’être of these platforms. Of course we have known from the start that we too were the product, even in those pages. By signing in, we accepted a degree of loss of privacy and property rights to the corporations that fund the technology. But today censorship in the old sense has reappeared, in all its ugly form. I do not need to be told that “this view is challenged by many”, or “that opinion is contested”: I can check this myself. I believe the US presidential elections of 2020 were fraudulent in the swing states. I believe the whole pandemic saga is another fraud, a plot by corrupt politicians and big pharma to divert once again public funds to private interests. I do not aim at convincing others of this, it’s up to them, but I intend to carry on debating these issues with people whose views I am interested in, without some idiots interfering. So out we go.

People who may want to know what I think, or wish to debate with me, can follow me on these pages, or on Parler. I wish you all a happy and safe 2021.

Image source:

Coup d’État

“There is no substitute for American leadership and exceptionalism. America should not fear our enemies. In fact, we should clearly define our enemies, face them head on and then defeat those that seek to defeat our country and our way of life.”—Michael Flynn

At time of writing the democratic party candidate to the 2020 US presidential elections, Joe Biden, has declared victory and the US Mainstream media crowned him “president elect”.

However president Donald Trump has not conceded, and furthermore alleged of massive electoral fraud. There are indeed some serious questions regarding the results, the way postal voting appears to have been used fraudulently in those states and counties where the democratic party organisation seems to be in charge of the electoral counting process. Many witnesses have claimed that republican party observers were prevented to attend the counts. Thousand of postal votes appear to have swayed the results in favour of Biden in circumstances that may already be illegal in several “key states”.

However the process is not at the end, despite the claims of the massed ranks of neo-cons, globalists, and their supporters in the US and Europe. As usual Mainstream media in the US and Europe are villifying the president and spreading false news. This has been an uninterrupted fact for the past four years.

What prospect is there of establishing the legal results and revoking the fraudulent ones? This is a matter for the courts, and finally, the US Supreme Court. A short backgound may help readers not already convinced by the Spectacle unrolling about “president elect Biden”.

The US electoral system is antiquated, unhomogenous, and open to fraud via the legal postal voting provisions. Those are not consistent across the country, with some states allowing late arrival of postal votes, and little verification of voters’ identities. The problem is part of the US political legacy, and predates modern times. Fundamentally the electoral and two-party system precludes clear majorities in normal circumstances. In recent decades majorities in Congress have been wafer-thin, often paralysing decisive executive actions.

It is too early to anticipate the end point of the legal process engaged by the presidential administration. Ultimately the Supreme Court will determine the outcome. The process thus ends when the judges say so. It is however permitted to wonder whether fraud on a massive scale is, like the proverbial banks, “too big” to revoke.

Image source

Interview with Doctor Joseph Goebbels

We meet with Doctor Goebbels, somewhere in Berlin, with minimum preparation.

HD – Doctor Goebbels, this is a real pleasure, and I am grateful you find the time to meet me, in those rather stressed circumstances, here in Berlin.

JG – hallo Honoré! The pleasure is mine. You said “stressed circumstances”, are you stressed?

HD – I would say, rather angry. They are closing my local gym, just at the time I was slowly going back to fitness…

JG – Yes, I understand. And of course you were here when the circus started. Perhaps we could talk about this to get started?

HD – Excellent idea. What is your take about all this business of pendemic and the measures taken by our politicians?

JG – We are following, and have been following the situation since the beginning. Some of our friends here, you know, people who don’t espouse our philosophy, but are nonetheless close to our way of thinking, well, believe it is evidence of the ineptitude of those politicians, cretins advised by charlatans. Our feeling so far is that it may be a little more complicated. Let me explain.

HD – Of course you are aware that the national oppositions everywhere are highly critical of how this is being handled?

JG – Of course, and with good reasons. It’s not just that huge errors of judgement were committed, but no-one has so far recognised these mistakes, owned up as it were. We see the problem as part of the overral position of the so-called “western democracies”. Before the pendemic the situation was dire already, with those western politicians struggling with multiple crises. In Europe the real economy never recovered from the disaster of the financial implosion of 2008. European, and particularly German, banks were up to their eyeballs in the frenetic speculation that preceded the subprime crash. The result has been dual: first the debt crisis that engulfed the Eurozone, and then, what one of your analysts has described as the “dollarisation of the Euro zone”. In other terms the worldwide tentacles of the judeo-US financial blackhole is about to swallow Europe. The effects on the real economies are obvious. The political situation reminds us of a body slowly giving in to a generalised cancer: one by one the healthy organs give in. In Germany, the Merkel disaster accelerated in 2015 with the “welcome refugees” scandal. This was a violation of the constitution, as well as a crime against German society and workers. In France the presidential elections ended up, thanks to the so-called left “opposition”, with a larbin of the Rothschilds in the Elysée. Britain has been in economic and political crisis at least since the beginning of that absurdity called Brexit. So, comes January 2019, and the Chinese government, not known for knee-jerk reactions, slapped martial law in a city of 12 million inhabitants. Again, we can understand why, an unknown pathogen, perhaps a biological weapon, lots of fatalities in a short time. Reaction in the West? Utterly inept: often denial of reality (the Chinese gone mad, “Kung Flu” etc.), absence of any measures of protection for nearly two months. An elementary measure would have been to stop international air travel immediately. Not at all. It continues for months, and only after some highly publicised fatalities in some regions are known, steps are being taken.

HD – So far I follow, but what about now?

JG – I am getting there! The fact is that we do not know for sure what happened in Wuhan. The range of symptons since named Covid19 has most probably a natural pathogenic cause. But what it is is not known, despite assertions to the contrary. A Corona-type virus has ben posited, but this is merely hypothetical. The trouble is that to the initial inept response, or absence of, was very quickly added the game of private and vested interests: the Pharma powerful lobbies, the pseudo science – a good example is the KI in my country, and others such as the stats department at Imperial College in London etc. Charlatans advising imbeciles! The situation called for a multi-disciplinary method, but this has only seriously taken place in Russia, China, Cuba and few other non-western countries.

In the meantime the populations are subjected to idiotic “lockdown measures” that are positively nefarious. Forcing people to stay at home, when a major factor of infection and aggravated symptoms is a deficiency in Vitamin D, for example. As you said yourself, Honoré, closing your local gym cannot improve your or your neighbours’ health prospects! So, this is where we are. The good news is that the only objective measure of excess deaths per capita is almost nowhere much different from that in the summer. There are exceptions, and we do not know what causes the extreme immune reaction that appears to affect some individuals. On the other hand we know that many elder citizens died as a result of isolation and loneliness.

HD – Well, what is the bad news?

JG – It is that your politicians are now trying to use the pendemic, to justify a clamp-down on civil liberties.

HD – well, I am surprised to hear you use these words, Doctor Goebbels!

JG – You should not be. Remember that most of our time and policies were dictated by war. Now the situation is completely different. There is no war in Europe. Unless you count the laughable attempts by the criminal organisation called NATO to tickle the bear’s toes on their periphery. No those idiots are motivated by fear: Merkel is widely despised, in particular here in Ostdeutschland. The national oppostion is getting stronger. Same in France. In the UK, where people are traditionally more obedient, realism is increasing as to the shambles caused by the current majority party. In the US, even if the Obama/Biden/Clinton gang succeeds in their endeavour, a large section of opinion has realised that the American political class doesn’t give a dam. People are well aware of the growing inequalities everywhere.

HD – That is certain. But how do you see this situation evolving in th next few years?

JG – We are interested in what Russia does. No shambles there. They have succeeded in developing the kind of weapons our Führer was dreaming of. The balance of military superiority is now in their favour. They have made many friends in the Middle-East, in Asia. Their strategic cooperation with China, the top world economy in real terms, is impressive. They are moving away from Europe. We like that. You see, we were wrong about the USSR. Wrong to invade, wrong to let the real enemy profit from us, our blood, our ruin. We too, have learnt. But now, when the plutocrats start losing their grip, as must happen sooner or later, the USSR won’t be there to save their beacon. And they, the banksters, the rich oligarchs in London, or Wall Street, or Frankfurt, know that when people decide enough is enough, they will find us. Ready for them.

Picture source:,

Russian malign interference in American politics…

The irrational obsession among the American political class with allegations of Russia being portrayed as a threat to its national security has been around for a long time. The mentality extends to other designated foreign “enemies” of the U.S. Typically it is a ruling class obsession, not shared innately by most ordinary Americans.

This week saw yet more U.S. intelligence claims of Russian malign interference in American politics (as well as alleged interference from China and Iran). The claims are characteristically hollow and tedious. But this irrational obsession long predates the Trump era. We can go back to the Red Scare years of the Cold War in the 1950s. And even beyond that.

Indeed, as Ron Ridenour contends in his excellent book, The Russian Peace Threat, the American phobia is traced back to the 1917 revolution and the creation of the Soviet Union. The phobia was concealed during the Cold War decades as a seemingly ideological confrontation with communism, but since the Soviet Union dissolved nearly 30 years ago, the American hostility towards Russia has only intensified, not diminished. The supposed confrontation with communism was therefore not the underlying whole rationale.

The explanation has more to do with how American power views all rivals as unacceptable. Other nations are either footstools for U.S. power, in which case they are euphemistically called “allies” or “partners”. Or else if they are labelled “enemies” when they don’t allow themselves to be subjugated to Washington’s writ.

Russia and China are the primary examples of how U.S. power demonizes others today. But the alleged threat from both is illusory. The Russophobia and its Chinese version must however be maintained because phobia is the essence of how American imperial power operates. It is a zero-sum mentality demanding complete deference from others or, if failing that, then garnering complete hostility from the U.S.

Creating foreign enemies is not only about controlling international relations. The invocation of foreign enemies is also a way for the American ruling class to control its domestic population.

The surprise election in 2016 of Donald Trump to the White House so disturbed the political class that it was compelled to delegitimize his presidency by alleging that it was due to Russian interference. The relentless and irrational Russophobia to undermine Trump by his domestic political enemies has only transpired to fatally weaken American global power. The political squabbling and infighting has wreaked havoc on the moral authority and legitimacy of American institutions of governance. The legislative government, the presidency, the judiciary, the intelligence apparatus, the legacy media, and so on. Every supposed pillar of American democracy has been eroded over the past four years with alarming speed.

A big part of this precipitous demise is due to Russophobia: the relentless sowing of doubt and confusion in American institutions, primarily the presidency, with insinuations of Russian interference. In their attempts to delegitimize Trump, his domestic enemies among the U.S. establishment have ended up delegitimizing public esteem of American democracy. How paradoxical! America’s own worst enemy turns out to be itself.

According to one recent poll, some two-thirds of Americans believe that the election on November 3 will not be fair. The bickering and vilification over the past four years has ended up leaving the majority of voters with no confidence in their democracy. Russophobia has been a central part of the self-defeating process.

Returning to the Russian “peace threat”, it is a counterintuitive albeit accurate theme. It is not exclusively related to Russia. One could include contemporary U.S. relations with China, Iran, Venezuela, Bolivia, Nicaragua, North Korea and other designated “enemies”. For the greatest danger to American imperial power is the prospect of peaceful international relations. U.S. power relies on capitalist exploitation of the globe’s resources. For this to succeed, the world must be framed in terms of ideological battle zones so that American corporate power can take advantage by demonizing “enemies”. The Cuban revolution of 1959 was immediately targeted by the U.S. as unacceptable because it represented the “threat” of democracy and peace in the rest of Latin America, thus impeding American imperialism.

Likewise, we can cite the Russian revolution of 1917, only that development was on a much greater scale. American and other Western capitalist ruling classes had to kill the Russian “peace threat”. The attack on the Soviet Union began immediately with Western-backed counter-revolutionary war on Russia. The hostility culminated in covert Western support for the rise of Hitler’s Third Reich and the Nazi attack on Soviet Russia. And the U.S.-led Western antagonism continued after World War Two for the five decades of the Cold War, during which the world lived under the shadow of nuclear annihilation.

As noted above, even after the supposed “evil” Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, the U.S. and its Western allies have continued to demonize Russia, even though the latter does not actually pose an ideological or military threat.

The “threat of peace” comes from Russia’s principled position of demanding genuine parity for all nations. Such parity is unacceptable to the United States which through its presumed exceptionalism only adheres to unilateral dominance. The imminent collapse of the New START nuclear arms control accord due to American prevarication in the face of reasonable offers from Russian President Vladimir Putin for extending the treaty is a manifestation of the “threat of peace”.

Russophobia is a diseased mentality among the American ruling class. It is endemic. It is an indispensable part of their conception of U.S. global power. Russophobia has been central to attempted control of foreign relations, and just as importantly, as part of the attempted control of America’s own domestic politics.

The forthcoming presidential election is descending into farce with grave implications for civil unrest in the U.S. Central to this farce is the collapse in confidence, trust and respect among Americans for their own democratic process and institutions of government.

Russia, or other foreign powers like China, Iran and so on, have nothing to do with this inherent American implosion. Yet Russophobia is so engrained that the self-inflicted political crisis is blamed on nefarious Russian, and other foreign, plots. Which just goes to show: delusion and paranoia know no bounds.


Vom Sturmgeschütz zur Dicken Berta – im amerikanischen Wahlkampf gibt es mehr Facetten als im „Spiegel“ zu erkennen

“Donald Trump hat es hingegen in den vier Jahren seiner Amtszeit fertig gebracht, den bis dato ausgegrenzten 40% eine Stimme zu geben – das ist jener solide Sockel von Stammwählern, der den „Spiegel“ so verzweifeln lässt. Er hat es dabei auf sich genommen, sich mit sämtlichen Eliten gleichzeitig anzulegen: den technologischen des Silicon Valley und der Digitalindustrie, den Bildungseliten der Universitäten sowie der Finanzoligarchie rund um Wall Street.”



von Notan Dickerle, Anwärter auf den Leuchtturmpreis für mutigen Journalismus gegen “Bunt”

Die Online-Ausgabe des „Spiegel“ wartete am Sonntag mit einer ganz besonders aparten politischen Stilblüte auf: „Das größte Problem an Trump sind seine Wähler“ durfte Kommentator Hendrik Müller feststellen, denn „es ist ein Skandal, daß Donald Trump die Präsidentschaftswahl immer noch gewinnen kann – trotz aller Verfehlungen und Ungeheuerlichkeiten.“

Da ist man als Leser erst einmal platt, denkt im nächsten Moment an Bertolt Brechts berühmten Satz von der Regierung, die ein neues Volk wählen sollte, wenn sich das alte nicht bewährt hat, wobei in diesem Fall die Regierung natürlich der „Spiegel“ wäre. Aber der steht bekanntlich nicht im luftleeren Raum, sondern für das System unserer guten

View original post 850 more words